You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on After Go, what games should be next for DeepMind? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: InquilineKea 10 March 2016 08:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (73)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 15 March 2016 02:54:37PM *  1 point [-]

it's because it can do things humans simply can't

Humans also can't run massive searches on deep trees or hold a huge library of opening moves in their memory.

AIs solve problems differently from humans. Software is much better at some things (from micromanagement to aimbotting to doing things quickly) and is much worse, so far, at other things. The interesting place is the edge -- where software and human capabiilties are currently of the same magnitude. That's why aimbots are boring and a machine playing Go is oh so cool.