You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TRIZ-Ingenieur comments on After Go, what games should be next for DeepMind? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: InquilineKea 10 March 2016 08:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (73)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TRIZ-Ingenieur 16 March 2016 10:43:08PM 0 points [-]

Why not check out the AGI capabilities of Alphago... It might be possible to train chess without architectural modifications. Each chessboard square could be modelled by a 2x2 three-state Go field storing information about chess figure type. How good can Alphago get? How much of its Go playing abilities will it loose?

Comment author: gjm 17 March 2016 01:14:21PM 1 point [-]

Each chessboard square could be modelled by a 2x2 three-state Go field

This isn't at all the same thing, but it might amuse you: Gess the game.