= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on The Thyroid Madness : Core Argument, Evidence, Probabilities and Predictions - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (132)
Post 2 of 3 was virtually ignored; post 1 got a lot of votes. My guess is no one with a modicum of medical knowledge has looked at it, so they up voted to increase the post's visibility because you're open to criticism and they're curious, then they had no reason to up vote the second time. Like CronoDAS said, it would be cool to have Sarah Constantin look at this. Or maybe Scott Alexander, though he's not an endocrinologist.
This also seems like exactly the sort of thing NancyLebovitz has been looking for.
Not only is it the sort of thing I've been looking for, I've linked it at SlateStarCodex.
However, looking at the lack of response, I think want this sort of well thought-out material, I also want well-thought out material which leads to good conversation. This may be a harder thing to define.
I am flattered again. Why have you been looking for this sort of material, and how do you define 'this sort'? I will be happy to optimise for good-conversation-provoking-ness. I am seeking argument. I want people to tell me what I have missed.