You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CronoDAS comments on The Thyroid Madness : Core Argument, Evidence, Probabilities and Predictions - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: johnlawrenceaspden 14 March 2016 01:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (132)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CronoDAS 16 March 2016 01:27:58PM 1 point [-]

Spinal manipulation (of the kind practiced by chiropractors) has been shown to be an effective treatment for acute back pain...

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 16 March 2016 05:33:47PM *  0 points [-]

Oh brilliant! Well done medicine! How long have they been claiming that? For twenty years I've been going to see a witch-doctor, and now it turns out her spells really have kept me out of a wheelchair.


Aargh, I've just believed you without checking because it fits. A primary sin. Do you have a reference for that?

Comment author: CronoDAS 17 March 2016 11:05:31PM *  0 points [-]

Never mind. My original source was my father (who's usually pretty reliable when it comes to pseudoscience) but apparently the current Cochrane review says it's no better than placebo. (The subluxation theory of chiropractic is nonsense, but it's not ridiculous that fiddling with someone's back can relieve back pain - massages, for example, tend to feel good.)

(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23169072/?i=3&from=/22972127/related)

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 18 March 2016 05:10:22PM *  0 points [-]

The thing you linked is not from Cochrane. They say:

http://www.cochrane.org/CD005427/BACK_combined-chiropractic-interventions-for-low-back-pain

I paraphrase: (it works, a bit, it's as good as anything else as far as we know, we have no clue really, further research is needed.)

That looks like science. I am glad they do what they do.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 18 March 2016 04:46:57PM *  0 points [-]

Your dad might be right! This is from NICE (British recommendations for national treatment, a very sane system in my opinion, they try not to waste public money on things that don't work or are too expensive)

The manual therapies reviewed were spinal manipulation (a low-amplitude, high-velocity movement at the > limit of joint range that takes the joint beyond the passive range of movement), spinal mobilisation (joint movement within the normal range of motion) and massage (manual manipulation or mobilisation of soft tissues). Collectively these are all manual therapy. Mobilisation and massage are performed by a wide variety of practitioners. Manipulation can be performed by chiropractors and osteopaths, as well as by doctors and physiotherapists who have undergone specialist postgraduate training in manipulation.

1.4.1 Consider offering a course of manual therapy, including spinal manipulation, comprising up to a maximum of nine sessions over a period of up to 12 weeks.

I have found over the years that a single session every year or so obliterates a problem that, if left unmessed-with becomes painful and eventually restricts my ability to play various sports.

The first time it was done (I was about 25?), a short-sighted friend blanked me in the street because the way I walked had changed and she didn't recognise me. She said the way I walked had been very characteristic, and now it was more normal!

I don't know what NICE are basing their recommendation on, they could conceivably be going after a cheap placebo effect.


P.S. My nice chiropractor says I have: Ilio-psoas hypertonicity secondary to Sacro-Iliac instability.

P.P.S. Careful. Chiropractors are loonies. Their explanatory theory is rubbish. My personal chiropractor is great. I would be very very suspicious of even her colleagues, let alone the rest of her profession. On the other hand, at least they are trying obvious things, to see if they work.