You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MrMind comments on Open thread, Mar. 14 - Mar. 20, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MrMind 14 March 2016 08:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (212)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MrMind 16 March 2016 04:25:24PM 2 points [-]

Isn't some sort of deism at least plausible and reasonable at this juncture?

That would majorly depend on what "deism" means, as a concrete model, other than "here my other models break down". After all, if you can postulate an intelligent and moral being, with exactly our own kind of intelligence and morality, with the power of creating a universe, then surely you can posit, with much more confidence, an unintelligent and amoral system with the power of creating a universe.

Is there a materialistic theory of what happened before the big bang that is worth putting any stock in?

There are many, but none of them are in the realm of testability due to the dependency to a flavor of quantum gravity. Let's not forget that the Big Bang is a singularity, meaning a point where the model breaks down and cry. If you want to go 'before' the Big Bang, you need a wider model (that is, a theory of quantum gravity).

Or are we in an agnostic wait-and-see mode regarding pre-big bang events?

That is surely the most sensible approach at our point in time.