You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open thread, Mar. 14 - Mar. 20, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MrMind 14 March 2016 08:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (212)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 18 March 2016 10:25:38PM 2 points [-]

Douglas Lenat's Cyc, of which I was reminded by another comment in this very thread, seems to have become much more powerful than I would have expected the first time I heard of it.

Can you provide a link to the powerful demonstrations of Cyc?

Comment author: moridinamael 21 March 2016 02:06:56PM *  0 points [-]

Lenat's Google Talk has a lot of examples.

Among them would be giving Cyc a large amount of text and/or images to assimilate and then asking it questions like:

  • Query: "Government buildings damaged in terrorist events in Beirut between 1990 and 2001." A moment's thought will reveal how complex this query actually is, and how many ways there are to answer it incorrectly, but Cyc gives the right answer.

  • Query: "Pictures of strong and adventurous people." Returns a picture of a man climbing a rock face, since it knows that rock climbing requires strength and an adventurous disposition.

  • Query: "What major US cities are particularly vulnerable to an anthrax attack?" This is my favorite example, because it needs to assess not only what "major US cities" are but also what the ideal conditions for the spread of anthrax are and then apply that as a filter over those cities with nuanced contextual awareness.

In general Cyc impresses me because it doesn't use of any kind of neural network architecture, it's just knowledge linked in explicit ontologies with a reasoning engine.

Comment author: Viliam 20 March 2016 10:55:58AM *  0 points [-]

It's good at marketing.