You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Link: Evidence-Based Medicine Has Been Hijacked - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: Anders_H 16 March 2016 07:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam 20 March 2016 08:57:54PM 1 point [-]

Seems to me like two different questions:

(1) Should an average person try to study medicine and statistics and find out the answers for themselves, or use an expert opinion?

(2) Are people recognized by current laws / credential systems as "experts" really the best available experts?

I would support people getting information about their health from organizations like 23andMe. But I don't expect 23andMe to do all research on their own -- at some moment they are going to rely on some peer-reviewed study. There should be a system where the studies are not easily gamed by financial interests of pharmaceutical companies, or by pressure on scientists to publish even when there is nothing worth publishing.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 March 2016 03:03:45PM *  2 points [-]

Should an average person try to study medicine and statistics

An average person should not do many things. That is not a good reason for people who are not average to abstain from these things.