You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

WalterL comments on Open Thread March 21 - March 27, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 20 March 2016 07:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clarity 22 March 2016 07:44:25PM *  1 point [-]

Containment thread

1. Negotiating self defense

Stranger A: I'm going to beat you up

Stranger B: I have photographic memory and illustrate professionally.

Stranger A: I could kill, blind or main you.

Stranger B: I could escape then submit your likeness to the authorities

2. Experimental philosophy

Is anyone here an ethical intuitionist or not?

3. Happy home

Observational studies suggest distance to work is associated with happiness. I moved about 15km closer to work and now walk there, and guess what, I'm a lot happier! Potential confounders: moved out of family home, family home was hostile environment

4. Unhappy babies

Babies frequently cry and are generally helpless. What if they are suffering beyond our comprehension and our shallow memories are our respite from that early trauma?

5. Techno v.s. natural reincarnation

People compare the possibility of resurrection after cryopreservation to the possibility of resurrection without cryopreservation as a slim chance v.s. no chance. I'm skeptical that brain death would imply information theoretic death, when you considr the shear size of the universe, and possible arrangements of matter over time in order to arrange in the form that materialises you, in some stable way, again. Reincarnation, if you will. My reservation against cryonics is not the slim chance, it's that paying for that slight increase in chance is trivial.

Comment author: WalterL 22 March 2016 08:01:12PM 2 points [-]

I don't understand what's going on here.

What does it mean that this is a "containment thread"

What is going on with this dialog?

Comment author: Lumifer 22 March 2016 08:43:22PM *  8 points [-]

Clarity has a habit of shotgunning shards of his mind dumps across multiple comments. He has been trying to limit the spread, though, and place most of these shards within a "containment thread" the purpose of which is to be a designated place for the shards and thus constrain the collateral damage.

Comment author: Clarity 25 March 2016 09:45:06AM 1 point [-]

Confirmed