You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

dlarge comments on In Defence of Simple Ideas That Explain Everything But Are Wrong - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: johnlawrenceaspden 22 March 2016 03:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: dlarge 23 March 2016 09:55:16PM 1 point [-]

Maybe this is getting too far afield, but I would say that "Purpose" is not only a useful, but an essential heuristic in science when it's being practiced by a kind of entity (like human beings) who are hard-wired to think in terms of purposeful action. Making the first question "What is this for?" brings to bear the full power of uncounted generations of field-tested behaviors, rules of thumb, and search strategies.

It is awfully important, though, not to make it the last question. I guess that's where I'd say yes, a "full-blown concept of purpose" in the sense of an unexplained explanation, is unscientific.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 25 March 2016 06:15:30PM 0 points [-]

I agree with both parts of this.