You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on Abuse of Productivity Systems - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: SquirrelInHell 27 March 2016 05:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 29 March 2016 05:34:57AM *  0 points [-]

I'd need a more concrete question.

@Brillyant Which part of what Elo wrote is controversial? Also, my examples are fictional, so what sense of "truth" do you mean?

Comment author: Elo 29 March 2016 06:47:18AM *  0 points [-]

You asked a question generated from the examples; you said I gave "a very good summary", is there anything more you wanted to add to the summary?

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 29 March 2016 08:49:39AM *  0 points [-]

Err, now I don't know whose questions I'm answering, so I'll just focus on this part: "is there anything more you wanted to add to the summary?"

You already did a good job of pointing out where the mistakes were, so if I wanted to add something, it would be on the "fixing things" side.

My impulses tell me that besides the "big picture" description, it is useful to identify very specific thoughts or actions that could help, or serve as an early warning system.

E.g., to use patterns from Eliezer's sequences, that are well known to LW-ers:

This is the first time it has ever happened to her.

Response: Sally notices that she is confused, and immediately writes this in her surprise journal. Then she enters a "debug models/cognitive patterns" mode and brainstorms for 5 minutes.

(Note that the above is an example I picked for clarity, not because it's the best one in this case.)