You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Brillyant comments on Abuse of Productivity Systems - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: SquirrelInHell 27 March 2016 05:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 30 March 2016 02:18:49AM *  1 point [-]

Your [Elo's] answers seem definitive

There's no point in arguing about this, but let me just say that they didn't seem that way to me.

This, for instance, seems too simple:

In the continuation of that thread, I point out that:

So obviously there's a connection (motivation is necessary as "fuel" for productivity, and having productivity and successes makes it easier to get motivation), but those are two different things.

I don't think many people would miss this connection. But first, it was useful to split our mental buckets and define what concepts we are talking about, before talking about complicated synergies that occur between concepts.

In any case, you raise other interesting points, so let's move on to this:

The really interesting question here, I think, is how to create the "artificial" motivation

OK.

So now I'll try to give you a fun tool, that I personally find useful.

Please try it out and tell me what you think.

It is called the "find motivation" game.

It goes like this:

  1. Choose something you are not motivated to do (but would like to see it done somehow).

  2. Realize that for you to identify something you would like to see done, even though you have no motivation to do it, already requires you to have motivation on some level. Otherwise, you would never have raised this issue in step 1.

  3. Trace back until you find that motivation.

  4. Repeat the game until you run out of things to choose in step 1.

While this does not guarantee that you have enough motivation, it at least guarantees you have some.

In other words, I don't believe you can call any of your motivation "artificial" and be self-consistent.

Comment author: Brillyant 30 March 2016 03:28:45AM 0 points [-]

On your "game": Meh.

In the example, Bob fails because he hasn't sufficient motivation to learn other languages. This is tied to the fact he is confusing motivation with productivity methods. Okay.

He still has some motivation. Just not enough. And that's the problem that needs solving. Zero versus tiny motivation. Meh. Okay. Yon win.

In the real world, we are aware certain pursuits would be good for us, but we don't do them. You could say there is the small seed of motivation that exists evidenced by the fact that we recognize we want to want to do these things, but the problems of actually making accomplishments still exists. Bob still fails despite having ostensibly good productivity methods in place.

Anyway, I'm tapping on this. I think this is basically a thread where no one has established good definitions of any of the key words being discussed. I don't see any reason to believe the ideas here are novel or practically useful.