You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on What makes buying insurance rational? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: rayalez 31 March 2016 08:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 01 April 2016 12:21:00AM 2 points [-]

apparently to figure out whether the risk is worth taking you multiply expected value of the outcome by it's probability.

Nope, that's how you calculate the expected value and not the risk. In fact, risk is entirely absent from this calculation.

But buying insurance is a slightly different question. Basically, insurance makes sense when a possible loss will have large secondary and tertiary effects the negative value of which is large.

For example, consider a retired couple without much savings living in a house with a paid-off mortgage. Let's say the house is worth $200K. What happens if the house burns down? Is their loss $200K? Nope, their loss is much bigger because they don't have a place to live, can't afford another house, and their life just got much worse -- more than the nominal loss of $200K would indicate.