You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

skeptical_lurker comments on April 2016 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: ArisKatsaris 01 April 2016 08:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 07 April 2016 07:24:00PM 1 point [-]

In the story the attacks supposedly committed by minorities are actually committed by the government. To map this onto reality, it appears that the story is an allegory for how Bush did 9/11!

But I'm fairly sure Bush didn't actually mastermind 9/11. And I imagine that if there were a society of animals with human-level intelligence, different species would commit crimes at vastly different rates - after all, regardless of whether human biodiversity is a thing, animal biodiversity certainly is!

So I thought the moral of the story completely falls to pieces when you think about it. Despite that, the film was certainly enjoyable.

Comment author: CronoDAS 09 April 2016 02:33:53PM 0 points [-]

Well, by a faction within the government...

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 08 April 2016 10:08:16AM 0 points [-]

Aside from mapping onto anything in particular, the mayor is a predator. Why is he involved int the conspiracy?

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 08 April 2016 04:19:26PM 0 points [-]

He was in a separate conspiracy. The deputy mayor was turning the carnivores savage, the mayor was covering it up. They had no knowledge of what the other one was doing.