You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open Thread April 4 - April 10, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Elo 04 April 2016 04:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (211)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 13 April 2016 05:20:38PM *  1 point [-]

Lumifer generally does not address the entirety of the comment, instead selectively quoting several sentences from various points in the comment and then snarking at those.

There is a reason for that. Addressing the entirety of the comment usually requires that your answer be longer than the comment you're replying to. That leads to large walls'o'text of fisking very very quickly and the whole thing implodes shortly afterwards.

In my experience to keep a manageable conversation going for more than a couple of rounds you need to severely prune the topics and keep the whole thing on a (possibly meandering) track. Of course both sides can/should do this: I don't expect that every point I raised will be addressed in the reply. As to snarking, well... :-)

Re EDIT:

Snarky one-liner? Check.

I like snarky one-liners.

Does not actually address the main point? Check.

Nope. It actually addresses the main point of the post it's replying to.

More condescending than informative? Check.

Not condescending. Snarky (see above). Condescending would have been "Don't worry your pretty little head about it".

Comment author: dxu 13 April 2016 05:43:40PM 0 points [-]

I like snarky one-liners.

I don't. (See, two can play at this game.)

Comment author: Lumifer 13 April 2016 05:50:11PM -1 points [-]

I don't. (See, two can play at this game.)

Not snarky enough.

Your move :-P