You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Turning the Technical Crank - Less Wrong Discussion

43 Post author: Error 05 April 2016 05:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (134)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 05 April 2016 09:56:05AM 9 points [-]

I (too?) am nostalgic for the good ol' days of Usenet. I'm very very unconvinced that an NNTP-based system could realistically replace Less Wrong. I'm interested in what you have to say, but wonder whether there's value in some kind of brief overview post along the lines of "Here's the one-paragraph summary of why I think this is probably a good idea. Here are one-sentence summaries of the strongest five objections and why they don't change my mind."

(But maybe not; the effect might be to put off people who could have been persuaded with a gentler run-up.)

I do wonder whether you can really need twenty posts to make your case. Perhaps much of the material will be useful in other ways (e.g., to inform future attempts at community-building, collaboration, etc.)?

Comment author: Lumifer 05 April 2016 03:00:28PM *  6 points [-]

I do wonder whether you can really need twenty posts to make your case.

The perennial cry is "LessWrong needs more high-quality content!" And when such is offered you go "Eh, condense it into a tl;dr"?

Comment author: gjm 05 April 2016 04:50:51PM 6 points [-]

Nope, that's not what I intended to say. (My apologies for any lack of clarity.) Rather, I think that

  • 20 posts of high-quality content on a single rather peripheral topic arriving in rapid succession would not necessarily be an improvement;
  • if there are going to be 20 such posts, a TL;DR as well might be helpful at the outset.