You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AstraSequi comments on The Thyroid Madness: Two Apparently Contradictory Studies. Proof? - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: johnlawrenceaspden 10 April 2016 08:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (76)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AstraSequi 23 April 2016 02:01:35PM 1 point [-]

This open-access article discusses some of the issues in cancer research.

In most ways biology is intermediate between the hard and soft sciences, with all that implies. It’s usually impossible to identify all the confounders, most biologists are not trained in statistics, experiments are complex and you can get different results from slight variations in protocol, we're trying to generalize from imperfect models, many high-profile results don’t get tested by other labs, ... all these factors come together and we get something that people call a “replication crisis.”

Comment author: Lumifer 23 April 2016 06:15:57PM 1 point [-]

tl;dr It's complicated.

Yes, I know. But it would be nice if people recognized that it is complicated and not pretend that we know more than we actually do.