You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Open Thread April 11 - April 17, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Clarity 10 April 2016 09:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (145)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAltar 13 April 2016 03:20:26PM *  -1 points [-]

Fairly soon I imagine you'll get games that allow you to choose the pronouns used to address your character separate from their looks and a slider or more freeform body-sculpting ability rather than just two choices.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 April 2016 05:17:32PM -1 points [-]

Do you mean the pronouns used to address your character are automatically edited to be what you want?

It would be interesting if people could put up lists of the pronouns they prefer, and that would give them a tool for roughly judging how much trouble people are willing to go to to appear to be on their side.

Are there any games which encourage a you/thou distinction?

Comment author: Lumifer 13 April 2016 05:32:05PM 4 points [-]

Games typically will avoid pronouns and just use the character's name. It's not hard because most of the dialogue in games is addressed to the player and is not two NPCs talking about the player.

Are there any games which encourage a you/thou distinction?

In English the only reason to use thou would be some fake medievalism along the lines of Ye Olde Electronics Shoppe. But I wonder how things work in e.g. French where tu/vous distinction is alive and well.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 16 April 2016 03:36:51PM 0 points [-]

Cabinet Minister: On se tutoie?

Mitterand: Si vous voulez.

Actually it's dying out in French (or possibly going back to being a singular/plural distinction rather than a familiar form), I sound gloriously stuffy because I'm not very good at the tu forms and tend to call people vous even once I've been properly introduced. My French teacher said "You will never know anyone French well enough to call them tu, so there's not much point in learning that, except for the exam". That was probably true in the 1950s.

In Greek and German it's even worse, the second person singular and plural are both familiar, for friends and family only. With strangers you have to say things like: "Would the gentleman care for a glass of beer", and sound like some sort of creepy servant.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 April 2016 09:25:34PM -2 points [-]

I was thinking about chat between players.

Comment author: Lumifer 14 April 2016 12:53:27AM 3 points [-]

Well, most players don't care. However in games with enough population you are likely to have role-playing guilds which will go to some trouble to role-play and yes, that involves the language used in chat (on the third tentacle there is always an OOC (out of character) chat channel where you can speak normally).

Gender-wise, everyone is assumed to be a guy -- unless (a) you explicitly declare yourself a girl; (b) you are on voice comms and your voice is clearly that of a girl; (c) you're in guild chat where people know that you're a girl.

Comment author: Nornagest 13 April 2016 10:19:59PM *  1 point [-]

It's hard to get players to use specific speech patterns, and harder to teach them to get it right. I've worked on a game which tried to get players to use pseudo-Elizabethan prose (in a particularly ham-handed way, granted), but in practice what happened was the people who didn't care just used natural speech, and the people that did used whatever butchered old-timey dialect they thought would be appropriate for their character. Most people didn't care.

Comment author: bbleeker 14 April 2016 10:37:17AM 1 point [-]

Are there any games which encourage a you/thou distinction?

I hope there are not, people would use the wrong cases and verb forms all the time.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 16 April 2016 03:29:30PM 0 points [-]

No, but there's American English. I've been trying to introduce you and y'all in Cambridge, it's pretty cool.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 April 2016 04:57:38PM 2 points [-]

I've been trying to introduce you and y'all in Cambridge, it's pretty cool.

Keep in mind that it's more complicated than just singular/plural. There are three forms: you, y'all, and all y'all.

Comment author: TheAltar 20 April 2016 01:17:00AM 0 points [-]

there's also ya'all

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 17 April 2016 09:48:43PM 0 points [-]

I didn't know about all y'all. That's also pretty cool. Does "y'all" carry the implication "but not all y'all"?

Comment author: Lumifer 18 April 2016 01:06:43AM 0 points [-]

Well, it's second-person so I'm not sure in which situation you would choose to use y'all to mean "you guys here but not those guys over there".

Comment author: gjm 18 April 2016 10:40:17AM -1 points [-]

I had thought "all y'all" arose where "y'all" had come to be used universally, even when referring to a single person, so that "all y'all" became the new plural form. But that seems to be an oversimplification. See this discussion on Language Log which I think makes it clear that singular y'all is relatively rare but by no means unknown, and suggests that "all y'all" is used in different ways in different places.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 April 2016 02:38:18PM *  0 points [-]

The last time I queried an authoritative source on y'all (a waitress in a Waffle House in South Carolina), she was quite sure that "you" should be used for one person, "y'all" should be used for up to 5-6 people, and if you're addressing more than that, it's "all y'all".