You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gjm comments on The Sally-Anne fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion

27 Post author: philh 11 April 2016 01:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: gjm 11 April 2016 01:20:59PM 0 points [-]

I see this fallacy all the time, and it's good to have a name for it.

Usually when I see it[1] it's in a political context where employing the fallacy is an effective rhetorical move (because it lets you switch from "Hated enemy group X disagrees with us about a controversial question of fact" to "Hated enemy group X wants cute babies to die in agony"). I suspect few people in such a dispute are (1) willing to listen to a complain that the argument is fallacious and also (2) willing to accept a framing with "because that thing is true" as part of it.

So I guess this is best used "internally", as a tool for thinking about one's own mental mistakes. (Like most things in the field of cognitive biases, probably.)

[1] Or maybe it's just when I notice it.