You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

James_Miller comments on How to provide a simple example to the requirement of falsifiability in the scientific method to a novice audience? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Val 11 April 2016 09:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: James_Miller 13 April 2016 02:27:55AM 1 point [-]

You are out to get me. If you're mean to me, that's direct evidence. If you're nice, that's also evidence that you are trying to trick me into trusting you. If you ignore me, well that's the worst of all because it proves that you are trying to divert my attention from you so you can plan your attacks on me in secret.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 14 April 2016 04:54:00PM 0 points [-]

That's not non-falsifiable. That's overly complex if you don't have other reasons to believe it. But it might well be true, and confirmation might be about to bring itself to your immediate attention.