You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

casebash comments on Anthropics and Biased Models - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: casebash 15 April 2016 02:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: casebash 15 April 2016 05:20:27PM *  0 points [-]

How am I begging the question? That isn't clear.

I don't believe that the probability of life in our universe is almost zero, but you can read all about the Fine-Tuned Universe argument at Wikipedia which is how this claim is most often made. My post is not targeted at the question of whether life really is that unlikely (I suspect that the parameters needed for life are not as strict as often claimed, only for life as we know it). The question I am trying to examine is whether the anthropic principle is a sufficient counter to the Fine-Tuned Universe (it is not); I'll leave it to other people to discuss other objections to the Fine-Tuned Universe.