You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

OrphanWilde comments on Does immortality imply eternal existence in linear time? - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: turchin 17 April 2016 11:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 18 April 2016 03:28:59PM 2 points [-]

Given that the human mind has a finite number of states, any given linear-immortal being, at some point in time, becomes indistinguishable from immortality with finite time duration.

Comment author: turchin 18 April 2016 07:00:03PM 1 point [-]

I could become non human with arbitrary large mind size. But if we suggest that a finite upper limit of possible mind exist, like no more than 1 exobyte, then your objection works.

If we suggest that there is no upper limits of complexity of possible minds and AIs, then your objection doesn't work.

But some form of it may be still true. Because the larger the mind, the slower it works. Galaxy size mind would think one thought for 100 000 years. So it may result in some kind of limit of actual size of the minds, but more calculations are needed.