You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gleb_Tsipursky comments on [Link] Salon piece analyzing Donald Trump's appeal using rationality - Less Wrong Discussion

-13 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 April 2016 04:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 April 2016 04:07:23PM 0 points [-]

Nancy, I could have certainly made similar points about Sanders, although less emphatically. To some extent, all candidates are appealing to anger and fear, although Trump is the clearest and most strident example. This is why at the end of the article, I noted that "he is not the only candidate doing so. Whatever candidate you are considering, my fellow Americans, I hope you deploy intentional thinking and avoid the predictable errors in making your political decisions."

Good question on checking whether I'm right. I didn't go into this in depth in the source, due to space limitations, but I read quite a bit of primary sources of why people are voting for Trump. I have a scholarly background in studying emotions and deployed that methodology for studying this topic.

Comment author: Thomas 24 April 2016 05:47:20PM 3 points [-]

Should we expect your Anti-Trump campaigning here until November, or what?

Comment author: James_Miller 24 April 2016 06:13:37PM 6 points [-]

I will probably vote for Trump if he wins the Republican nomination, and I don't think the article was anti-Trump.

Comment author: Thomas 25 April 2016 09:16:14AM *  2 points [-]

I am not an American and I'll not vote. I hate the intelligentsia's attitude toward the man.