OrphanWilde comments on Open Thread May 2 - May 8, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (149)
Probably saying the obvious, but anyway:
What is the advantage of nice communication in a rationalist forum? Isn't the content of the message the only important thing?
Imagine a situation where many people, even highly intelligent, make the same mistake talking about some topic, because... well, I guess I shouldn't have to explain on this website what "cognitive bias" means... everyone here has read the Sequences, right? ;)
But one person happens to be a domain expert in an unusual domain, or happened to talk with a domain expert, or happened to read a book by a domain expert... and something clicked and they realized the mistake.
I think that at this moment the communication style on the website has a big impact on whether the person will come and share their insight with the rest of the website. Because it predicts the response they get. On a forum with a "snarky" debating culture, the predictable reaction is everyone making fun and not even considering the issue seriously, because that's simply how the debate is done there. Of course, predicting this reaction, the person is more likely to just avoid the whole topic, and discuss something else.
Of course -- yes, I can already predict the reactions this comment will inevitably get -- this has to be balanced against people saying stupid things, etc. Of course. I know already, okay? Thanks.
Speaking as somebody who frequently engages in non-nice methodologies:
Niceness is more convincing. Way more convincing. And if you can get somebody to be mean enough to you, while you're being nice, that somebody feels like they should defend you, cognitive dissonance will push them to believe in your beliefs a little bit more.
If some people are nice, and some people are mean, we're injecting some very subtle irrationality into people reading our discourse.
So there is an advantage in picking one and sticking to it. (Or my policy, which is to match the tone of my opponent as well as I can.) And niceness is probably an easier schelling point that meanness.