You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Improving long-run civilisational robustness - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: RyanCarey 10 May 2016 11:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 11 May 2016 05:54:03PM 1 point [-]

Why would we colonize another gravity well? This one is already 90% of our problem with colonizing space.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 May 2016 06:17:18PM 2 points [-]

Because you can use resources from Mars once you are there. Mars has the potential to carry a human civilisation. It has the potential to be terraformed.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 11 May 2016 06:28:49PM 2 points [-]

Mars has the potential to carry the sort of civilization we have now; it's another planet, we make it like Earth, we get another Earth, we colonize it and live like we do on Earth.

Space stations have the capacity to carry an entirely new sort of civilization. The resources are out there, too - more scattered, yes, but your processing plant and drilling equipment are far more mobile in space. More, once you have industry running, gravity wells are a substantively smaller problem.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 May 2016 07:22:06PM *  2 points [-]

Mars has the potential to carry the sort of civilization we have now; it's another planet, we make it like Earth, we get another Earth, we colonize it and live like we do on Earth.

Mars will never by just like earth. Different gravity matters. Culturally the process of building up Mars likely won't produce a culture that matches earth.

Earth's patent law likely won't be enforcable on Mars. Genetic engineering might be legal on a much wider scale than earth.