You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ImNotAsSmartAsIThinK comments on Anti-reductionism as complementary, rather than contradictory - Less Wrong Discussion

-2 Post author: ImNotAsSmartAsIThinK 27 May 2016 11:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ImNotAsSmartAsIThinK 30 May 2016 01:22:52PM 0 points [-]

That's what I mean by complexity, yeah.

I don't know if I made this was clear, but the point I make is independent of what high level principles explain thing, only that they are high level. The ancestors that competed across history to produce the organism of interest are not small parts making up a big thing, unless you subscribe to causal reductionism where you use causes instead of internal moving parts. But I don't like calling this reductionism (out even a theory, really) because it's, as I said, a species of causality, broadly construed.