You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gleb_Tsipursky comments on Information Hazards and Community Hazards - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 14 May 2016 08:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: woodchopper 15 May 2016 12:49:19PM *  -1 points [-]

I think a very interesting trait of humans is that we can for the most part collaboratively truth-seek on most issues, except those defined as 'politics', where a large proportion of the population, with varying IQs, some extremely intelligent, believe things that are quite obviously wrong to who anyone who has spent any amount of time seeking the truth on those issues without prior bias.

The ability for humans to totally turn off their rationality, to organise the 'facts' as they see them to confirm their biases, is nothing short of incredible. If humans treated everything like politics, we would certainly get nowhere.

I think a community hazard would, unfortunately, be trying to collaboratively truth-seek about political issues on a forum like LessWrong. People would not be able to get over their biases, despite being very open to changing their mind on all other issues.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 15 May 2016 04:46:42PM 0 points [-]

I think a community hazard would, unfortunately, be trying to collaboratively truth-seek about political issues on a forum like LessWrong

Yeah, good point there. That's why it might work in a small private setting of an LW meetup, but not so much on the open forum of LW.