You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Iterated Gambles and Expected Utility Theory - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: Sable 25 May 2016 09:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 26 May 2016 06:39:07PM 1 point [-]

Dollars are fungible. If you expect to sometimes trade off risk vs. expected value, then you can aggregate all such events and act as if choosing your strategy for many or all of them at once.

So even if you don't think you'll be offered this particular gamble, as long as you expect to encounter other vaguely similar decisions, you should choose more high-risk, high-reward options. Unless, as others have pointed out, you can't afford to take the financial risk in the short term.

Comment author: Lumifer 26 May 2016 08:58:49PM 3 points [-]

Dollars are fungible.

But your position on the timeline is not. Context matters, even in the crude maximize-expected-utility approach because you need to know your wealth at the time of the decision.