You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Pimgd comments on Counterfactual Mugging Alternative - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: wafflepudding 06 June 2016 06:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Slider 06 June 2016 01:20:28PM 0 points [-]

I think even with the ordinary phrasing the omegas prediction can be thought to sit in a sealed envelope as the real you picks. You don't think about the problem until then with your own brain. But in a way the contents of the envelope can be deduced from the transparent boxes.

I think it exhibits the same kind of wierdness. It doesn't really make sense to ever have the player choose only the empty transparent box, because the box will only be left empty if the player is predicted to pick both. So committing to not take both boxes means the boxes will be full. It doesn't really mean that the impossible "presented with two empty boxes" scenario is destroyed.

Comment author: Pimgd 07 June 2016 09:02:20AM 0 points [-]

I don't really have a reply to this, but pet peeve of mine: "wierdness" when you mean "weirdness"