You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gram_Stone comments on Availability Heuristic Considered Ambiguous - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Gram_Stone 10 June 2016 10:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gram_Stone 11 June 2016 12:43:58PM 1 point [-]

If I ask you to think of times that you were assertive, and there's music playing in the background and I tell you that this music makes it easy to remember times that you were assertive, then you won't use your feeling of easiness as a source of information in your judgment. Instead of using the feeling (which would make your assertiveness rating go down with the number of examples, because it would seem harder to think of them), you use the amount of examples (which makes your assertiveness rating go up with the number of examples). The main point of the third experiment is to show that there are conditions under which both interpretations of the availability heuristic are valid. Sometimes we use feelings of ease and difficulty, sometimes we use mental content.

Does that make sense?

Comment author: Romashka 11 June 2016 04:57:55PM 1 point [-]

Yes, thank you. I mean, I am probably having an attack of stupidity, but what exactly did they find? I understand the conditions, I just keep missing the results:( Sorry if you have already stated it above.

Overall, this was very interesting to read. Please continue!

Comment author: Gram_Stone 11 June 2016 09:15:54PM 1 point [-]

This is what I identify as the 'results' in my earlier comment:

Instead of using the feeling (which would make your assertiveness rating go down with the number of examples, because it would seem harder to think of them), you use the amount of examples (which makes your assertiveness rating go up with the number of examples).

I can offer you the source, I suppose? There are numbers in that. It should be easier to understand than it would have been if I hadn't introduced you to the experiment designs.