You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

John_Maxwell_IV comments on Revitalizing Less Wrong seems like a lost purpose, but here are some other ideas - Less Wrong Discussion

19 Post author: John_Maxwell_IV 12 June 2016 07:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (34)

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: root 12 June 2016 02:10:55PM 0 points [-]

Two questions:

  1. Can anyone who is a user for a significant amount of time give links to anything that wasn't deemed worhy of the sequences but is a worthy read? I have no idea when the sequences were collected but if LW was really great in the past, there would've been a bunch of other high-quality posts that are easily missed. This could also double as proof that LW was, indeed, as great as advertised.

  2. What do other places have that LW doesn't? If LW is dedicated to human rationality, is it truly doing that?

  3. Am I a complete dumbass for typing this? In hindsight, it doesn't take a special variation of Godwin's law to think 'someone probably posted a similar question before'.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 12 June 2016 08:38:32PM 0 points [-]

Here is a list of lists of archive posts.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit