You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

entirelyuseless comments on Rationality test: Vote for trump - Less Wrong Discussion

-18 Post author: pwno 16 June 2016 08:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: entirelyuseless 24 June 2016 04:34:26AM 0 points [-]

I don't have the same algorithm as others, and if I did, it would be good enough to choose one of us at random to be responsible. Taking votes from everyone would be highly inefficient.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 24 June 2016 05:26:33AM 1 point [-]

No. First, in case of humans this works by approximation, not exact copy. Second, you don't know what is the group of people who think in a similar way as you (clearly not all voters).

Comment author: entirelyuseless 24 June 2016 01:10:53PM 0 points [-]

You need an argument for your claim about approximation, especially considering the fact that I am a remote outlier. And I agree that not all voters think like me. That is exactly my point.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 27 June 2016 01:26:42AM -1 points [-]

Just take some time to consider how TDT applies to decision in real life. You will get it, I'm sure.

Comment author: entirelyuseless 27 June 2016 01:57:31PM -1 points [-]

The way it applies in real life, is that all the people like me will choose not to vote, and to work together for a better, less inefficient system, which will give us much more utility than if we had all chosen to vote.

Comment author: gjm 27 June 2016 03:41:22PM -2 points [-]

It seems to me that not voting and working for a better system are basically independent activities.

Comment author: entirelyuseless 27 June 2016 03:44:13PM -1 points [-]

Not entirely. It would take me at least 30 minutes to vote, and probably more, given the need to register. Together with the other people like me (and I am admitting there aren't very many, since I only include those who have a similar algorithm, not all those that happen to get the same outcome), that adds up to a good deal of time that could be spent on working for a better system, while there would still be no change in the outcome from voting, even if the group of us voted as a unit.

Comment author: gjm 27 June 2016 04:59:32PM -2 points [-]

There will also probably be no change in the outcome from working for a better system.