= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Gunnar_Zarncke comments on General-Purpose Questions Thread - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (30)
Too specialized. I'd ask for more information regarding his strengths. Or add a conditional when this applies.
I think I disagree. I'm not sure that 'strengths' is a real term for a dev.
In my view you either know or don't know a language. If you know it you are contributing to SO. If you don't you are looking things up on it. I don't really believe that a person could be a good computer programmer and there be a subfield that they couldn't master if it was necessary for their employment.
Whatever his current proficiency he'll be adding to his skill sets as needed. I'm suggesting a set that I think will be useful. I think it is the right level of specificity, even absent more information.