You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

James_Miller comments on Market Failure: Sugar-free Tums - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: PhilGoetz 30 June 2016 12:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: James_Miller 30 June 2016 02:02:18AM 4 points [-]

Kickstarter is part of the market so, from what you have described, Thinx is a market success story.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 30 June 2016 05:51:35AM 0 points [-]

My point is that the existing companies failed to provide a product that consumers wanted, and VCs relied on the "fact" that the market is efficient to "prove" that Thinx could not succeed, since it did not bring anything to the table that the big companies couldn't have done themselves..

Comment author: ChristianKl 30 June 2016 10:37:09AM *  2 points [-]

Thinx disrupts the existing business model.

Tampon producers make money by selling tampons that aren't reuseable. They might lose money if women's standard underwear absorbs all fluids and thus women don't need to buy tampons anymore.