= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Manfred comments on [Link] Suffering-focused AI safety: Why “fail-safe” measures might be particularly promising - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (5)
Oh my gosh, the negative utilitarians are getting into AI safety. Everyone play it cool and try not to look like you're suffering.
That's funny. :) But these people actually sound remarkably sane. See here and here for example.
Just commenting to point out that I'm having a fabulous day, and have a very painless, enjoyable life. I struggle to even understand what suffering is, to be honest, so make a note of that any negative utilitarians who may be listening!
Foundational Research Institute promotes compromise with other value systems. See their work here, here, here, and quoted section in the OP.
Rest easy, negative utilitarians aren't coming for you.