You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on A rational unfalsifyable believe - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: Arielgenesis 25 July 2016 02:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 July 2016 05:33:24PM *  1 point [-]

This SAME entity then also needs the ability to cure cancer. To me, adding abilities like this incurs complexity penalties on a pretty big scale.

This says that if you are, say, an Inca ruler and you hear about Spanish conquistadors, the fact that they can ride weird beasts AND shoot fire out of metal sticks AND do a lot of other supernatural-looking stuff implies that you should disbelieve their existence -- probably not a good idea.

In general terms, the complexity penalties you're are talking about are justified only if these different abilities are unrelated. But if, instead, all of them have a common cause (e.g. massive technological superiority), the penalties no longer apply.

Comment author: Pimgd 29 July 2016 07:20:10AM 0 points [-]

I see.