Know the probabilities of fatal and adverse side-effects and update them with evidence(Bayes' theorem mentioned above)
Update on all relevant evidence, even if you don't have empirical data.
I would add:
Make decisions based on cost/benefit analysis, not simply probabilities. For example, low probability treatments can make perfect sense to try if they are low risk, low cost.
Know that the failure to reject a null hypothesis is not proof of the null hypothesis. It does not establish the null hypothesis. A failure to reject is simply an epistemological failure.
Thanks that's clearer.. will update...
Hi all,
Please read the Disclaimers at the end of the post first, if you're easily offended.
Generalists(general medicine):
Specialists:
Basically the same skill sets as above. One difference is in the skill level and you should customize that as needed.
Some controversial ideas(Better use your common-sense before trying out):
Disclaimers:
* -- I understand this is difficult in Indian circumstances, but I've seen it being done manually(simply leaves of prescriptions organized alphabetically, link to dr.rathinavel) , so it's possible and worth the effort unless, you practice in area of highly migratory population.(for example rural vs urban areas).
**-- If you're trying to compete on availability for consultation, you'll need to be able to do this after being woken in the middle of the night.
I'm hoping to convert it into a rationalist skills for Doctors Wiki page, so please provide feedback, especially if you're practicing Doctors. If you don't want to post publicly email me(in profile) or comment on wordpress.