You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

SquirrelInHell comments on Mental models - giving people personhood and taking it away - Less Wrong Discussion

-10 Post author: Elo 11 August 2016 08:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (9)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 13 August 2016 03:24:16AM 0 points [-]

I'm not going to argue about this - as I said, I think the Kegan's model by itself is underspecified, and you can apply it in various ways to the same situation. Quite possible your application to politics makes more sense.

How would you characterize yourself in Kagan's framework?

If you are asking this question, you don't understand some critical things. Never ask this question.

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 August 2016 11:57:04AM 0 points [-]

If you are asking this question, you don't understand some critical things.

That might very well be true. I have invested a bit more thought into the Spiral Dynamics model of developmental psychology and extrpolate on that basis with the information that Wikipedia provides about Kegan's model.

But when it comes to polticians Wikipedia lists "Culture of mutuality. Mutually reciprocal one-to-one relationships." for stage 3 and "Culture of identity or self-authorship (in love or work). Typically: group involvement in career, admission to public arena." for stage 4. Being driven by wanting to increase the wellness of people in general seems to fall more into stage 4 than in stage 3.