You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TheAncientGeek comments on Help with Bayesian priors - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: WikiLogicOrg 14 August 2016 10:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (26)

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 30 August 2016 09:38:39AM 0 points [-]

What I mean by "vague but positive" is that you keep saying there is no problem, but not saying why.

I wrote a small post (www.wikilogicfoundation.org/351-2/) on what i view as the starting point for building knowledge. In summary it says our only knowledge is that of our thought and the inputs that influence them.

That's a standard starting point. I am not seeing anything that dissolves the standard problems.

So no matter our believes, we all have the same core drive - to satisfy our internal demands.

We all have the same meta-desire, whilst having completely different object level desires. How is that helping?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit