You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on Open Thread, Aug 29. - Sept 5. 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Elo 29 August 2016 02:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (119)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Elo 02 September 2016 07:17:32AM -2 points [-]

Tried listening.

3 minutes: most scientists are wrong.

doubt the rest is worth it.

Comment author: Elo 02 September 2016 07:23:12AM -2 points [-]

Oh god. This is really bad.

Someone should tell him about the straw vulcan.

The more we (lw'ers) are tied to the word "Rationality". That should happen less. If you feel personally affected by the idea that someone says this part of your identity is wrong, then maybe it's time to be more fox and less hedgehog.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hedgehog_and_the_Fox

Comment author: MrMind 02 September 2016 08:13:58AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: reguru 02 September 2016 11:32:52AM *  -2 points [-]

I think he's aware of the stereotype, but obviously, from my perspective, people are getting triggered left and right that rationality might somehow be wrong.

Of course not wrong in the sense that rationality in the matrix might still be considered "superior" over all other Ways in the matrix. But it is still the matrix and we're happy to play that game because it's fun :)

Comment author: hairyfigment 05 September 2016 09:24:35AM 0 points [-]

So, you keep using that word, "rationality," even though we've mentioned that LW uses it to mean something else. I don't know what you or the creator of the video mean by it, but I'm confident it's not the same. Perhaps instead of claiming that "people are getting triggered," you should ask yourself if you've succeeded in getting your most basic point across, or if we might be confused about which subject matter you want to address. Consider throwing out the video's words and finding new ones.

In addition, a good way to establish that your subject matter is real and not imaginary is to show people. When talking about stupidity this can be rude, but sometimes it seems unavoidable. I suppose in principle you could describe a time when you made the mistake in question.

Comment author: reguru 08 September 2016 01:47:27AM -1 points [-]

Rationality the word might as well be tree, it doesn't mean anything. It's simply a limitation of the mind to not see the obvious truth right there, or let's say nowhere.

I did not succeed in getting my most basic point across, neither do I know how to right now.

In addition, a good way to establish that your subject matter is real and not imaginary is to show people.

With the limitations of language, our current technology? You can only figure out the truth for yourself, it is empirical, it can't be otherwise.

I suppose in principle you could describe a time when you made the mistake in question.

Which mistake? In what larger context?

Comment author: reguru 02 September 2016 11:21:28AM *  0 points [-]

I think it is worth it. You don't have to process the information and adapt it as your own. Simply give an argument against it if you're willing to teach others.

Of course I don't know if it's worth it for you, it certainly is worth it for me to ask.

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 September 2016 06:16:27PM 0 points [-]

Simply give an argument against it if you're willing to teach others.

It's much easier to do that if the author is willing to actually provide an argument in written form instead of only being able to make his case in a YouTube video. Avoidance of the written word in favor of video to make deep arguments is generally a good signal of unclear thinking.