You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ArisKatsaris comments on September 2016 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: ArisKatsaris 01 September 2016 09:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 01 September 2016 09:58:03AM 1 point [-]

Online Videos Thread

Comment author: morganism 04 September 2016 08:57:54PM 0 points [-]

Im reading "Collapse" by J. Diamond now, so this caught my eye..

Collapse of Complex Societies by Dr. Joseph Tainter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0R09YzyuCI

Comment author: WhySpace 03 September 2016 04:16:45AM *  0 points [-]

EDIT: Perhaps I should say why this is relevant. Xrisk isn't just things which could destroy humanity outright, but also things from which we never recover. I'm also interested in building robust institutions which can survive unexpected circumstances, and have positive impact over centuries to influence the far future. (Nobel Prize Foundaton, DARPA's 100 year Starship, Long Now Foundation, etc.) Perhaps cryonicists will also find it interesting.

There was a recent TED talk on what makes systems robust in changing environments.

He starts with the example of the immune system, then mentions long-lived social systems (catholic church, roman empire), but goes on to focus mainly on applications to businesses that want to survive black swan events and industry disruption.

This flows somewhat counter to conventional wisdom, which says to optimize for growth by putting all your eggs into whichever basket has the largest growth rate or market.

He lists 6 characteristic that all these robust, long-lived systems have in common: Redundancy, Diversity, Modularity, Adaptation, Prudence, and Embeddedness.