= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
buybuydandavis comments on The map of ideas how the Universe appeared from nothing - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (42)
I lose no sleep over this. I think people who do are just confused by language.
I'd say that if you examine your concept of "why", you find it presupposes existence.
So when you ask, "Why did Sherlock Holmes tell Watson that...?"
You assume that Holmes exists?
Also, when you ask why some complicated theorem in number theory is true, you are basically asking for a proof from first principles (say Peano Arithmetic), you don't need to assume that numbers exist (which would make you a Platonist).
Thanks for sharing some idea about Universe appeared from nothing. There's no such thing as a free lunch, or so the saying goes, but that may not be true on the outstanding, cosmic scale. Since I am assignment help folks writer, providing writing service, several physicists now believe that the universe arose out of nothing during the Big Bang which means that nothing must have somehow turned into something.
Such a useful information. Problem solving is one of the key helps required to be successful at work, but definition speedy and creative solutions to the contests and difficulties that inevitably arise is not an easy task. I am working at Dissertation Help Desk at London, I would like to share this discussion with my academic team and students. When challenged with a problem, all too often, we try to ‘force’ our intelligence into coming up with a explanation. Not only is this a poor way to resource our creativity but this approach can result in stress while our mind wrestles with the problem.
I said as much in one of my replies to turchin. But that doesn't mean that the question has no answer.
But some people do like Tim Urban http://waitbutwhy.com/table/why-is-there-something-instead-of-nothing
I think that it is overkilling argument, as it may be applied to almost any question. Why Sun looks like a circle? Why we value human existence?
This "why" expresses some kind of lacking knowledge or confusion, but not exactly appropriate wording to really describe what is going on.
So our inability to find adequate wording for something as already incorporated into "why".
This. And if one is willing to entertain Tegmark, approximately 100% of universes will be non-empty, so the epistemic question "why a non-empty universe?" gets no more bite than the ontological one.