You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

scarcegreengrass comments on Politics Is Upstream of AI - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: iceman 28 September 2016 09:47PM

Comments (5)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: scarcegreengrass 03 October 2016 06:36:16PM -1 points [-]

To add some specificity to this article, I can think of a few examples of cultural/philosophical perspectives that most people often take as assumptions in the LW Diaspora (that would not be shared by all historical humans). I like most of these assumptions, but it's always nice to specify your axioms, right?

• We are observers of an objective system of matter and energy that follows simple, particle-level rules.

• Most physical goals can be achieved given enough thought.

• Every running instance of a pattern that is close to a human brain is a moral peer. We want to promote the prosperity of peers. Mammals and other megafauna are peers of maybe 1/10 the moral weight.

• We want moral peers to have comfort, happiness, and (maybe instrumentally) control over their lives.

• We prefer to promote the prosperity of each individual human over the prosperity of an organization or the prosperity of each human cell.

• We would prefer to replace 'barren' regions (eg Mars) with ecosystems or industrial systems.

• A consensus of many diverse intelligences usually makes safer, more accurate decisions than a dictatorship of one intelligence.

• Where our current cultural perspective differs from past, contemporary, or future cultural perspectives, we are open to the idea that our perspective is not the best.

• Earth transitioned from an abiotic planet to a planet with a biosphere, and that is somewhat unusual.