You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Open thread, Oct. 03 - Oct. 09, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 03 October 2016 06:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (175)
Tags: open_thread

Comments (175)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 06 October 2016 09:06:57PM 0 points [-]

If a AGI does thinks in a very complicated way it might not meaningfully get consent for anything because it can't explain it's reasoning to humans.

Is that necessary for consent? I mean, one does not have to understand the rationale for undergoing a medical procedure in order to consent to it. Its more important to know the potential risks.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit