You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on *How* people shut down thought because of high-status respectable halos - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: NancyLebovitz 20 October 2016 02:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 20 October 2016 09:38:28PM 2 points [-]

This doesn't sound like an example of Ra-ness. Could you (or someone else) elaborate?

Comment author: James_Miller 21 October 2016 01:14:40AM 2 points [-]

It's more to the title than article. Megyn Kelly's halo, by virtue of her being a high-status beautiful women, had the (unused) ability to hijack my will

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 21 October 2016 12:57:55PM 2 points [-]

Your reaction was a lot of why I changed the title-- I clearly wasn't saying what I meant.

The original title (from memory) "Blinded by the light-- how people shut down thought because of high-status halos". It still could use some work.

Comment author: hairyfigment 22 October 2016 11:45:48PM 0 points [-]

Yes. I like the article more as it goes on - but, for example, the author couldn't even get through one essay before calling people "Ra-like". This would be very disturbing if it actually worked as an insult.

(On a possibly related note, she gives the example of someone implying "a negative-utilitarian belief that humanity ought to be annihilated." Now this does sound like something I've encountered and attributed to runaway signaling. But we should consider the possibility that the speaker mistrusted his interlocutor in particular. Perhaps he thought he had good, solid reasons to believe any future that person created would be worse than death.)