I'm not a physicist, but if I wanted to fuse metallic hydrogen I'd think about a really direct approach: shooting two deuterium/tritium bullets at each other at 1.5% of c (for a Coulomb barrier of 0.1 MeV according to Wikipedia). The most questionable part I can see is that a nucleus from one bullet could be expected to miss thousands of nuclei from the other, before it hit one, and I would worry about losing too much energy to bremsstrahlung in those encounters.
As another year comes around, and our solstice plans come to a head I want to review this year's great progress in science to follow on from last year's great review.
The general criteria is: World changing science, not politics. That means a lot of space discoveries, a lot of technology, some groundbreaking biology, and sometimes new chemical materials. There really are too many to list briefly.
With that in mind, below is the list:
Things that spring to mind when you ask people:
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_in_science
Note: the whole thing is worth reading - I cherry picked a few really cool ones.
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016:
Notable deaths:
Nobel prizes:
100 years ago (1916):
Nobel Prizes in 1916:
Other:
Meta: this took in the order of 3+ hours to write over several weeks.
Cross posted to Lesswrong here.