The scientific method involves guesses (called "hypotheses") and criticism (including by experimental tests). That follows the pattern of evolution (exactly, not by analogy): replication with variation (guessing), and selection (criticism).
That follows the pattern of evolution (exactly, not by analogy)
Not at all. Hypothesis generation doesn't look like taking the current view and randomly changing one element in it. More importantly, science is mostly teleological and evolution is not.
But let's take a trivial example. Let's say I'm walking by a food place and I notice a new to me dish. I order it, eat it, and decide that it's tasty. I have acquired knowledge. How's that like evolution?
Why expect AGIs to be better at thinking than human beings? Is there some argument that human thinking problems are primarily due to hardware constraints? Has anyone here put much thought into parenting/educating AGIs?