It sounds like solomonoff induction. The idea isn't that the one that got the right answer was obviously the best prior. It's that they're the one that matches the new evidence. It's just like how in solomonoff induction, you eliminate all the hypotheses that have been falsified, and leave the ones that just happen to match reality.
Tell us a story. A tall tale for King Solamona, a yarn for the folk of Bensalem, a little nugget of wisdom, finely folded into a parable for the pages.
The game is simple:
This isn't a thread for developing new ideas. If you have a novel concept to explore, you should consider making a top-level post on LessWrong instead. This is for sharpening our wits against the mental perils we probably already agree exist. For practicing good thinking, for recognizing bad thinking, for fun! For sanity's sake, tell us a story.