It's entirely possible for working life to be awful and people living those lives to genuinely self-report an average of 7/10 on a happiness scale. This is likely due to facts about how humans set their baseline happiness, how they respond to happiness surveys, and what social norms have been inculcated.
Like, when given a scale out of 10, people might anchor 5 as the average life, and for social signaling and status purposes, reasons for them being different-better are more available to their conscious mind than reasons for them being different-worse, so they add a few points.
There are also other problems with the average happiness level being above average - it suggests some constant is at work.
I just realized that a link to an article by Angus Deaton about a Gallup poll that I meant to include in the comment above didn't compile. I've since added it.
It's entirely possible for working life to be awful and people living those lives to genuinely self-report an average of 7/10 on a happiness scale.
I agree. But I don't see the considerations that you bring up as decisive. Several points:
•According to Angus Deaton's article
...I focus on the life satisfaction question about life at the present time, measured on an eleven-point scale from 0 (“the w
From Mike Darwn's Chronopause, an essay titled "Would You Like Another Plate of This?", discussing people's attitudes to life:
Conclusion, graphs, and references in article. As usual, I recommend reading Chronopause.com as Darwin has many good articles; to quickly link a few: