juliawise comments on Review: Selfish Reasons to Have More Kids - LessWrong

17 Post author: jsalvatier 29 May 2012 06:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (257)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: juliawise 30 May 2012 10:43:08PM 2 points [-]

Cambridge, MA. Lots of lefty professorial and computer types, also lots of Haitian and Cape Verdean immigrants in housing projects.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 31 May 2012 01:21:20AM 3 points [-]

In different neighborhoods. Specifically, would your children be playing with the children in the projects?

Comment author: juliawise 31 May 2012 12:31:51PM *  2 points [-]

Probably. They'll certainly be going to school with them. We haven't bought a house yet, but all the areas we're considering have projects nearby.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 02 June 2012 01:28:31AM 3 points [-]

I'm willing to assign significant probability that when you actually have kids and see them experience first hand the actual quality of the school, you'll arrange for them to go to a charter and/or private school (or possibly even home-school).

Comment author: Multiheaded 02 June 2012 05:12:14AM 0 points [-]

Would you please share your own experience with American public schools, if you have any?

Comment author: Dolores1984 03 June 2012 09:18:22AM 2 points [-]

I went to an inner city public school for several years. The last year I attended (I was pulled out and homeschooled afterwards), one of my teachers made a cell out of bookshelves to put students who had misbehaved. They were all black. When called on it, she said she was 'getting them used to it.' There was also a lot of petty vandalism, bullying, and the educational quality was pretty miserable. If it makes you feel any better, I'm almost certain this experience was an outlying data point.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 03 June 2012 03:56:15AM 2 points [-]

I wasn't in an "inner city" school.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 June 2012 05:03:15AM 1 point [-]

I was. The experience was good. I learned to double-dutch jump rope, and play the dozens. I didn't learn to dance the Cabbage Patch, no matter how many times my classmates tried to demonstrate it for me, but that was my failing and not theirs.

Then I took the SAT, got a good score, and on the strength of my high school and my zip code was offered a good scholarship to a private liberal arts college.

What I'm trying to say is: the piece Eugine_Nier is missing is how drastically parental wealth, income, and educational attainment affect the kids' educational outcomes. If you look at the research, these factors drastically outweigh the quality of the school or the teacher. That's not to say that teachers have no effect; but, so far as these things have been quantified, the family background is more important by an order of magnitude.

In other words -- if you are doing relatively well, and if you read a lot of books, it almost doesn't matter where you send your kids to school. In fact, sending them to a diverse "inner city" school could be very helpful from a social point of view.

It was for me.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 03 June 2012 09:59:35PM 4 points [-]

In other words your school was ok provided you are willing to do all your learning outside of it.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 July 2012 12:54:03AM 1 point [-]

Wait -- that's not how everybody does their learning?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 09 July 2012 03:18:30AM 1 point [-]

I learned a lot in school, especially once my parents got me out of the public school system. I would argue that sending child to a school where they're not going to learn anything is an example of a lost purpose.