Alejandro1 comments on Rationality: Appreciating Cognitive Algorithms - LessWrong

37 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 06 October 2012 09:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (134)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: curiousepic 10 October 2012 07:22:52PM *  -1 points [-]

Whenever I see semantic dissection in major posts, I always worry that language is just too messy, just a towering stack of cards, and wonder why there isn't more discussion about why we use English when the language doesn't seem optimal for science and seeking Truth. Obviously it's rational for those who already speak English to continue using it for lack of an immediately available, preferable alternative, but I don't see much discussing this fact, arguing whether we should start over, etc. Admittedly, I haven't yet grokked the "ways words can be wrong" sequence.

My previous post on the topic.

Help me get over my linguistic-existential dread by refuting (or accepting) the statement "To develop optimal rationality skills, the first step should be to redesign our linguistic operating system."

Comment author: Alejandro1 11 October 2012 12:07:21AM 2 points [-]

As RichardKennaway says, it has been tried before, and never worked. You might be interested in Umberto Eco's book "Search for the Perfect Language".